BLUETTI vs Anker: which brand is more reliable?

BLUETTI (Reliable) comes out ahead of Anker (Mixed) by our formula. The comparison uses CPSC recalls, Amazon owner ratings, court records and company records.

Side by side

BLUETTIAnker
VerdictReliableMixed
CPSC recalls, last 3 years04
CPSC recalls, all years07
Most recent recallNone on record2025-06-12: More than One Million Anker Power Banks Recalled Due to Fire and Burn Hazards; Manufactured by Anker Innovations
Owner satisfaction (Amazon)HighHigh
Product lawsuits on recordNone foundNone found
Company behind the brandSHENZHEN POWEROAK NEWENER CO., LTD. (trademark owner)Anker Innovations Limited (trademark owner)
Trademark owner (USPTO)SHENZHEN POWEROAK NEWENER CO., LTD. (China)Anker Innovations Limited (Hong Kong)
Made in (recalled products)No recall recordsChina 7 (of 7 recalls listing a country)
Customer serviceNot verified yet1-800-988-7973

Recall counts are not adjusted for sales volume. How the verdict works

Shop BLUETTI and Anker on Amazon

Full verdicts

FAQ

Is BLUETTI better than Anker?

BLUETTI (Reliable) comes out ahead of Anker (Mixed) by our formula.

Which has more recalls, BLUETTI or Anker?

In the last 3 years the CPSC lists 0 for BLUETTI and 4 for Anker; across all years, 0 and 7.

Are BLUETTI and Anker the same company?

No shared owner on record: BLUETTI trademark owner SHENZHEN POWEROAK NEWENER CO., LTD. (China), Anker trademark owner Anker Innovations Limited (Hong Kong).

Facts checked 2026-10-16.

How the verdict works

One formula for every brand, built from public records. We do not test products.

Owner satisfaction

Ratings of the brand's most-rated products on Amazon. High: weighted average of at least 4.5 and no more than 10% of products below 4.0. Medium: at least 4.2 and no more than 30%. Low: everything else.

Safety record

CPSC recalls in the last 36 months: none is Clean, one or two is Some, three or more is Frequent. Counts are not adjusted for sales volume.

Owners / SafetyCleanSomeFrequent
HighReliableGenerally goodMixed
MediumGenerally goodMixedUse caution
LowMixedUse cautionUse caution

Full methodology